Open side-bar Menu
 ArchShowcase
Sumit Singhal
Sumit Singhal
Sumit Singhal loves modern architecture. He comes from a family of builders who have built more than 20 projects in the last ten years near Delhi in India. He has recently started writing about the architectural projects that catch his imagination.

Museum of Contemporary Art in Zagreb, Croatia by Studio za arhitekturu d.o.o.

 
March 22nd, 2011 by Sumit Singhal

At a place that at the time of the competition had no urban characteristics, Franić took into consideration the strongly stressed orthogonal matrix of Novi Zagreb, from where he continued to develop the project. For Franić, the context is the entire Novi Zagreb, both in the sense of the heritage of modern city-planning culture and the area with specific ambience characteristics, which to a great extent marks the large, even gigantic scale of the architecture of open spaces.

Night View

  • Architect: Studio za arhitekturu d.o.o.
  • Project: Museum of Contemporary Art
  • Location: Zagreb
  • Client / Investor: City of Zagreb, Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Croatia
  • Project date: 1999.        competition       1st prize
  • Construction: 2003. –  2009.
  • Author: Igor Franić
  • Collaborators: Bernarda Silov, Morana Vlahović, Tajana Derenčinović Jelčić, Andreja Dodig,Petar Reić, Simona Sović Štos, Zorana Zdjelar
  • Contractor: Tehnika d.d.
  • Structure: Studio K d.o.o.
  • Mechanical Installations: Arhingtrade d.o.o.
  • Electrical Installations: Arhingtrade d.o.o.
  • Sewage and Water Supply: Arhingtrade d.o.o.
  • Fire protection: IB-inženjering Belobrajić d.o.o.
  • Acoustics: AVC d.o.o.
  • Total built area: 18 000 m2
  • Site area: 14 400 m2

Evening View

Public spaces are almost brutal in their articulation; these are mostly elements like platforms elevated over the parking lots and access plateaus in front of buildings, derived from infrastructural solutions. In Franić’s project it is possible to identify the acceptance and the development of the existing morphological models and spatial properties of Novi Zagreb; in it he uses the program, but also the symbolic capital of the Museum as the means by which he achieves detachment from neutrality of the surrounding built landscape in terms of meaning.

Night View of Museum of Contemporary Art

Franić’s project generates “its own city-planning” within the borders of the parcel and forms an ample square that slowly rises towards the large “hovering” mass of the Museum which covers the open public space. The relationship of the wide access cascades, the grand “neo-classicist” porch and the building itself reminds of Schinkel’s Altes Museum in Berlin. This is an architectural scene on metropolitan scale, which is rare in Zagreb. The monumental dimension of the colonnade is in logical proportion with the scale of the building, but also with the wider context, while the mass covering the porch contributes to dramatic impression.

Image by SZA

In the dialectics of symbolism of architectural elements and tectonic culture, Franić’s peristyle is a kind of transitional shape between the neo-constructive and rhetorical characteristics of the Ionic order at the entrance to Zagreb Stock Exchange by Viktor Kovačić and the neighbouring Vitić’s pavilion No. 40 along the Zagreb Fair, where a strong concrete construction on the gables is the principal architectural motive, logically corresponding with construction demands. In his solution, Franić intended to reconcile both poles – the symbolical characteristics emerging from rhythmical order and the simple logics of a hyper-dimensional ordinary concrete skeleton, which resulted in a specific crossover between representativeness and architectural rationality.

Night View

The entire ground floor of the Museum is open to movement, conceived as an extension of the square with the main entrance, restaurant and library, each with a separate access. The glass envelope of the ground floor is not unified, but diversified, which indicates different amenities. The entrance area with the large info-desk and a hall for lesser exhibitions shows modest proportions, it is intentionally non-monumental, without pronounced spatial attractions; we experience it as juxtaposed to the powerfully articulated porch. It is obvious that the ground floor is the place of transition between public city space and museum halls. There is only an indication of two routes of movement towards the permanent and the temporary display respectively, spatially indicated by the arrangement of the beginnings of staircases.

Front View

This spatial sequence is unambiguously just a preparation and a part of the scenario of movement suspense and experience of the building before entering the exhibition halls. Actually, we are still underneath the museum. Franić formed the body of the building as a geometrically very simple solid of approximately square ground-floor plan, whose cross-section is “folded” in the form of a meander. The configuration of the exhibition space directly emerges from this cascading cross-cut, so that the museum develops in a series of linear stretches vertical to the lateral, meandering profile of the structure. The basic direction of the spaces is defined by the sequence of x-axes parallel in relation to the entrance porch, whereby their format changes with progression, i.e. translation of the floor and the ceiling within y-coordinates.

Aerial View

These stretches show different heights and interrelations, and between them flow the terraces or the areas beneath the body of the building, so that along the y-axis exterior and interior spatial segments interchange. The reference to Julije Knifer, imposed by the form of the meander, should not be read in the literal, sense of fetishist adoption of a formal motive important for the tradition of Croatian abstract art, but in the sense that both for Knifer and Franić the rhythm of relational changes between “full” and “void”, “positive” and “negative” is important.

Hall

The body of the building is perforated by three vertical intrusions, of which two are also visible from underneath, while one skylight reaches the underground level. In its basic geometric scheme, spatial organization is simple; it is always of the same length on the x-axis, fixed through the matrix of an entirely consequential system within a square grid. In spite of pure Euclidean geometry, the manipulation with x-y-z axes is basically not founded in a logical or immediately readable spatial system, but it is rather a series of specific situations and a variation of relations inside-outside, up-down, and wall-transparency-translucency. In this progression, the first perception and the attempt at understanding the spatial configuration of the structure leaves a somewhat mystic impression, as if it were a series of individually conceived sequences that have obviously emerged from a series of interconnected geometrical operations and the same module, but we lack the feeling of entity.

Interior View

The Museum does not have a spatial focus on purpose, but it is designed as a spatial non-hierarchical equation, which also does not have a fixed or entirely readable trajectory. Namely the movement through the Museum can take different routes, so that the two main massive concrete stairs – one that services the permanent, the other the temporary display – are supplemented by “auxiliary” steel stairs and the escalator in the temporary display space. Such organization encourages the visitor to individually and actively investigate the exhibitions and discover his own way through different periods and media.

Interior View

Unexpectedly, light is not admitted into the interior from the lateral sides of the meander, but on the contrary, through horizontal stretches that run along the body of the building on the y-axis and vertical intrusions in the z-axis. Although natural light is not zenithal, it always reaches the interior indirectly, through interstices, atriums, and stretches set high above the ground. The exhibition space is introvert and directed at the exhibits, although the outer space is not entirely excluded from the overall impression, for example at the point of the linking “bridge” that connects the middle and the northern fold of the meander. Roof terraces are also accessible through two large exterior stairs that can also function as open auditoriums.

Aerial View

Exhibition spaces are not articulated either as a classical series of “white cubes” or as entirely open, fluid space, but rather as a series of relatively large halls of different configurations, divided into subspaces specifically adapted to micro-situations of the permanent display. The lateral sides of the meander are not intended for exhibitions, so that in the western part, along the large glass wall, an informal “rest area” is set up. Behind a screen visitors can “detach” themselves from art and enjoy the view towards the Većeslav Holjevac Avenue.

Image by SZA

The eastern stretch is occupied by offices and other auxiliary rooms. Like programmed mini-towers, two vertical blocks with autonomous usage routines rise through the core of the structure: the block with a restaurant that stretches from the ground floor over the first floor to the roof terrace and the block that contains the library. These amenities will also be used outside the opening hours of the Museum, which contributes to the variety of its contents. “Full” functional vertical blocks, together with elevator batteries, are juxtaposed to vertical “void” intrusions of skylights-atriums. The variety of program contents is enriched by the hall for lectures, screenings, and performances that also has an independent, outer entrance.

Models

The Museum is marked by refined design details on a micro-scale. The main stairs are L-shaped at the point of gradual and slowed-down transition from the ground-floor to the first floor and continued as straight stretches in the direction of the principal x-vectors of the exhibition area. The view towards the entrance porch and the square is from the exhibition area opened only at the strategic point of the access staircase’s end. On a fully defined body of the building, particular “traces” of inner structures are left on the exterior, like the bottom view of the escalator or the secondary stair under the northern fold of the meander.

Image by SZA

Image by SZA

Interior View

Hall

Interior View

Related posts:

Contact Studio za arhitekturu d.o.o.

Tags: ,

Category: Museum

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

GRAPHISOFT: ARCHICAD download 30-day FREE trial
CADalog.com - Countless CAD add-ons, plug-ins and more.



Internet Business Systems © 2017 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
25 North 14th Steet, Suite 710, San Jose, CA 95112
+1 (408) 882-6554 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy PolicyAdvertise